Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Deborah Schoeberlein: Life Lessons in the Ring

You'd think you're in England here at the High Prairie Horse Show in Parker, Colorado. I mean, the raincoats, mud-splattered boots and low hanging slate-grey skies look awfully British to me.

But the accents here are all-American, the horses like listening to Country-Western radio in the barns and the friendliness is homespun. Big-time horse shows like this are wonderful and weird, a world of their own.

Equine competition hones intense etiquette with a diamond edge. The kids participating in the competition learn abundantly from their horses, trainers, co-participants and judges as well as the parents, grooms and support staff. Manners are taught at every encounter. "Sir & ma'am," "please & thank you," and "yes, I can" are expected, required and rewarded.

The respect goes all around and has ancient precedent. Before attending to their own comfort, the knights of old cared for their tired horses at the end of the day. Today's young equestrians are trained the same way.

In time-honored tradition, riders are responsible for their mounts' health, comfort and wellbeing. In return, they expect the animals to move safely and attend to directions. There is a symbiotic relationship between horses and humans, and it works. It's also fabulous training for life: after all, responsibility and collaboration are key ingredients of success.

Here at High Prairie, success too, is measured on many levels. Sure, there's only one blue ribbon and everyone else queues up for the other spots. But within each class, every rider has the possibility of winning, of bettering their performance, or coming back after a fall.

Sometimes the judges see things that allude to other observers and someone places 6th who was thought to have earned a 3rd. But isn't life is like that after all? And don't things go easier when we learn that there are times when the only good option is to manage disappointment and accept the inexplicable.

This is a place of extreme concentration and detailed awareness. The horses and riders, their trainers and the judges know how to focus. You can't benefit from the experience if you don't pay attention. And it's not enough to focus; you have to know how to pick what you focus on, and then switch your mind away from all the distractions.

Today it's cold, muddy and wet. There are noises, smells and rain. The horses are nervous, and so are the horse people, riders (and parents). It's all too easy to slip and fall, and when you mix in the speed, height and power of the horses, the risks loom large for everyone. There is risk in the ring, just as there is in the world at large. And in the ring, as out in world, it's up to us to work together and make our way.

One last observation: there is mindfulness in the ring, a hushed awareness of the present moment and laser-like attention to each increment of experience. It's a mental, physical, emotional and for many, spiritual, thing. And despite the exclusivity of the horse world (and it is expensive, no doubt about it), there is a sense of community in the moment which embraces everyone here.

Many things in life are expensive, and but out here on the plains of Colorado, the price for love between horse and rider isn't outrageous. If you're lucky enough to be here, even as a kid from an average family income, you are one of the crowd and welcome.

Horses and humans share a history that spans many thousands of years. We are familiars and dependents, and among us there are leaders at every level. It seems clear here, at the Colorado Horse Park, that humans like horses, are herd animals. We warm each other, even as we compete to win or if simply join together and watch the show.

?

?

?

"; var coords = [-5, -72]; // display fb-bubble FloatingPrompt.embed(this, html, undefined, 'top', {fp_intersects:1, timeout_remove:2000,ignore_arrow: true, width:236, add_xy:coords, class_name: 'clear-overlay'}); });

vanna white michael robinson joe paterno memorial service taco bell breakfast menu ener1 national chocolate cake day epstein

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

U.S. Advisers Say 'No' to Routine PSA Tests for Prostate Cancer

MONDAY, May 21 (HealthDay News) -- In a highly anticipated move sure to unleash heated debate, a prominent U.S. government advisory panel is recommending that men of all ages no longer be screened for prostate cancer by undergoing the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) blood test.

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, an independent group of medical experts in prevention and evidence-based medicine, said PSA screening results in overdiagnosis of prostate cancer and unnecessary treatment that can leave men impotent and incontinent.

This final recommendation comes seven months after the task force drafted a report giving a "D" rating for the PSA blood test. Previous guidelines had stated that most men should undergo screening beginning at age 50.

"Some may say that by rating the test a 'D' we're taking away the possibility of an informed decision, but we don't want that to be the case," said task force co-vice chair Dr. Michael LeFevre, a professor in the department of family and community medicine at the University of Missouri School of Medicine. "This decision does not preclude a man choosing to be screened."

The task force is the same panel that in 2009 rejected regular mammograms for women in their 40s, after also concluding the benefits don't outweigh the harms.

The new recommendation is published online May 22 in the journal Annals of Internal Medicine.

About 242,000 new cases of prostate cancer will be diagnosed in Americans this year, and about 28,000 will die from it, according to the U.S. National Cancer Institute. More than two-thirds of those deaths occur after age 75, the task force said.

PSA tests -- which measure prostate-specific antigen, a protein produced by the prostate gland -- can detect which men are developing the malignancy. But they cannot discern between cases that will never become life-threatening and those that require treatment, such as surgery, radiation or hormone therapy.

Basing its recommendation mainly on two major trials of PSA testing in asymptomatic men in the United States and Europe, the task force concluded screening may only help one man in every 1,000 to avoid dying from prostate cancer. Up to five in 1,000 men will die within a month of prostate cancer surgery, the panel said, and between 10 and 70 per 1,000 men will suffer lifelong adverse effects, such as urinary incontinence, erectile dysfunction and bowel dysfunction.

Many will also suffer unduly from persistent anxiety, the report said.

Critics of the task force's decision said the group underestimated the PSA test's benefits and overestimated its harms and also overlooked significant methodological flaws in the studies on which it based the "D" recommendation. None of the task force members are urologists or oncologists, making them unqualified to broach the topic, some health experts said.

"I think they're throwing away the baby with the bathwater," said Dr. William Catalona, a professor of urology and director of the clinical prostate cancer program at Northwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago, who wrote an accompanying journal editorial condemning the move.

"There's just no other way to detect prostate cancer early than through PSA testing," Catalona added. "If we were to completely stop PSA testing in all men . . . it would result in countless men dying of metastatic prostate cancer. People are happy to be cured of their prostate cancer, even if they have some side effects."

Dr. Otis Brawley, chief medical officer at the American Cancer Society and an outspoken figure on the pros and cons of cancer screening tests, encouraged men to make their own choice about PSA screening while keeping the risks and benefits in mind. Certain men, including blacks and those with a family history of the disease, are at significantly higher risk of developing prostate cancer, he noted.

"I am hoping this (recommendation) shuts down mass screenings, where men are only told that this will help them, which is stretching the truth," Brawley said. "They're rarely told about the potential for harm and that, for the people running the screening, the [venture] is usually quite lucrative for them."

LeFevre said it remains to be seen whether health insurers will change their coverage of PSA screening based on the task force's recommendation. For one thing, insurers aren't supposed to tailor coverage decisions to USPSTF guidelines, he said.

"If you look at the overall costs of screening, the PSA test itself is very small," LeFevre said. "I'd be surprised to see them take what I call the political risk of backing away from that."

More information

For more on prostate cancer, visit the American Cancer Society.

st. bonaventure ira glass march madness swain match day nene dark shadows trailer

Considering Private Jet Charter: What You Should Know

Private jet charter is one of the best ways to travel and is the right choice in many different situations. There are lots of reasons why private jet charter may be the preferred method of getting to your next destination, whether you are taking a business trip or going on a family vacation. Before you decide to consider private jet charter, however, there are a few things to learn about chartering private air transportation.

Facts and Info About Private Jet Charter

One of the first and most important things to learn when considering private jet charter is that you have a great deal of flexibility associated with the type of air travel you can use. Many people wrongly believe that they will be stuck in a small prop plane if they decide to fly private. In fact, this is not the case at all.

When you charter a private jet, you can choose from a number of different size jets available to you, meaning that you can fit both large groups and small on your jet and that you can travel both far distances and close by.

Jets available to charter can generally be divided into four different size groups: heavy jets, super mid-size jets; midsized jets and finally light jets or turbo props. Light jets and turbo props can be a really fun and cost-effective way to fly, while larger jets will allow you to go farther and to bring more people with you if you choose.

Another key thing to be aware of when considering private jet charter is the fact that private jets fly into many more airports than standard commercial planes. Many people wrongly believe that they will have a broader range of destinations if they fly on a commercial plane since, after all, these airlines have so many passengers who want to go to so many different places.

The reality is, there are only around 550 airports that accommodate large commercial planes- so these planes can only fly into these destinations. Private jets, on the other hand, fly into an estimated 5500 airports. This is significantly more than the number of airports for commercial planes. With so many more options for where your jet can fly into- and with the ability to design your own itinerary based solely on your needs- you can eliminate unnecessary travel time and delays and you can get closer to your destination much more quickly.

Finally, it is important to realize that private jet charter does not have to be cost prohibitive. Chartering a private jet tends to be the least expensive way to become involved in private air travel. Fractional ownership shares and jet cards are both more costly ways to travel privately than private jet charter.

Learning these and other facts about private jet charter should help you to get a more realistic picture of what chartering a jet would really be like and of what the advantages to chartering are. With a little bit of research, you'll quickly come to see why private jet chartering is right for you.

ucla vs usc rich rodriguez rich rodriguez the muppet movie the muppet movie mars rover mars rover

real estate marketing

Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.

standing rib roast its a wonderful life its a wonderful life rex ryan yule log ham recipes adrian peterson

Monday, May 21, 2012

Hubble spies edge-on beauty: Galaxy NGC 891

ScienceDaily (May 21, 2012) ? Visible in the constellation of Andromeda, NGC 891 is located approximately 30 million light-years away from Earth. The NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope turned its powerful wide field Advanced Camera for Surveys towards this spiral galaxy and took this close-up of its northern half.

The galaxy's central bulge is just out of the image on the bottom left.

The galaxy, spanning some 100,000 light-years, is seen exactly edge-on, and reveals its thick plane of dust and interstellar gas. While initially thought to look like our own Milky Way if seen from the side, more detailed surveys revealed the existence of filaments of dust and gas escaping the plane of the galaxy into the halo over hundreds of light-years. They can be clearly seen here against the bright background of the galaxy halo, expanding into space from the disk of the galaxy.

Astronomers believe these filaments to be the result of the ejection of material due to supernovae or intense stellar formation activity. By lighting up when they are born, or exploding when they die, stars cause powerful winds that can blow dust and gas over hundreds of light-years in space.

A few foreground stars from the Milky Way shine brightly in the image, while distant elliptical galaxies can be seen in the lower right of the image.

NGC 891 is part of a small group of galaxies bound together by gravity.

A version of this image was entered into the Hubble's Hidden Treasures Image Processing Competition by contestant Nick Rose. Hidden Treasures is an initiative to invite astronomy enthusiasts to search the Hubble archive for stunning images that have never been seen by the general public.

Share this story on Facebook, Twitter, and Google:

Other social bookmarking and sharing tools:


Story Source:

The above story is reprinted from materials provided by NASA.

Note: Materials may be edited for content and length. For further information, please contact the source cited above.


Note: If no author is given, the source is cited instead.

Disclaimer: Views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of ScienceDaily or its staff.

michelle rounds michelle rounds dan quayle brett favre packers stock packers stock mastectomy

Outbox Problems

They will continue to be inside your Outbox until the receiver of your PM gets around to viewing your message. It does not mean that they were not sent, and if you are aiming to delete them, it is the same as removing messages from your inbox. Check the message and then mark them to be deleted.

(22:43:36) Rem?us says: There is only one horse in Skyrim worth having.
(22:43:47) Konstantein says: Shadowmere
(22:43:51) HitoriRaven says: MY LITTLE PONY
(22:43:52) Rem?us says: ^

buenos aires train crash presidential debate pga tour argentina train crash nancy pelosi nancy pelosi gop debate

Afghan Karzai: Thanks for ?your taxpayers? money?

President Obama, right, during his meeting with Afghan President Hamid Karzai at the NATO Summit in Chicago, May??

Looking to a day when "the Afghan war as we understand it is over," President?Barack Obama met Sunday with Afghan President Hamid Karzai to discuss NATO's withdrawal from that strife-torn country by the end of 2014.

Obama, who has put the draw-down of combat troops at the heart of his foreign policy, declared that "the world is behind the strategy" of giving Afghans control over their own security, but stressed that "now it's our task to implement if effectively."

Karzai, who aims to secure billions of dollars in long-term aid for his country's military and economy, said he looked forward to a day when "Afghanistan is no longer a burden on the shoulders of of our friends in the international community, on the shoulders of the United States and our other allies."

"I'm bringing to you and to the people of the United States the gratitude of the Afghan people for the support that your taxpayers' money has provided Afghanistan over the past decade and for the difference that it has made to the well-being of the Afghan people," Karzai told Obama.

The two leaders met on the sidelines of a high-stakes NATO summit consumed by the question of the alliance's withdrawal from Afghanistan by the end of 2014, and its role beyond that date. ?Obama has made it known he wants leaders gathered here to sign off on a plan to hand over combat duties to Afghan forces in 2013.

"There will be no rush for the exits," NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen told reporters as the summit opened, saying the alliance's plan was sound and vowing to "see it through to a successful end."

Beyond the tight security cordon around the summit, in the streets of Obama's adoptive hometown, protestors denounced the gathering for a second straight day."I would expect that such demonstrations would take place in a peaceful manner," said Rasmussen.

Obama also wanted NATO leaders to flesh out their own commitments to Afghanistan ? both in terms of troops and money ? until 2014 and beyond. Specific dollar amounts are not expected in Chicago, but a July donors conference in Tokyo should spell those out. The price tag for Afghan forces after 2014 is estimated to be $4.1 billion per year. Afghanistan is expected to pay $500 million of that. Karzai has said his country will need at least $10 billion per year in overall aid through 2025.

Obama looked ahead to a future?"in which we have ended our combat role, the Afghan war as we understand it is over, but our commitment to friendship and partnership with Afghanistan continues" and evoked ?"a shared vision that we have in which Afghanistan is able to transition from decades of war to a transformational decade of peace and stability and development."

Obama underlined "the enormous sacrifices that have been made by the American people, most profoundly by American troops, as well as the troops of our other coalition partners" and said Americans "recognize the hardship that the Afghan people have been through."

"The loss of life continues in Afghanistan. There will be hard days ahead. But we're confident that we're on the right track," he said.

"Afghanistan is fully aware of the task ahead and of what Afghanistan needs to do to reach the objectives that we all have, of a stable, peaceful and self-reliant Afghanistan. In the meantime, until then, thank you for your support," Karzai said.

(Karzai had given a somewhat different assessment of Kabul's relationship with Washington at a December 2008 joint press conference with then-President George W. Bush.

"Afghanistan will not allow the international community leave it before we are fully on our feet, before we are strong enough to defend our country, before we are powerful enough to have a good economy, and before we have taken from President Bush and the next administration billions and billions of more dollars -- no way that they can let you go," Karzai said, to nervous laughter from the audience.)

Among the challenges Obama's strategy faces: French President Fran?ois Hollande isn't budging from his campaign pledge to withdraw his country's roughly 3,600 combat troops by the end of 2012 ? one year sooner than his predecessor Nicolas Sarkozy had planned. Hollande suggested after talks with Obama at the White House on Friday that French forces could stay on to help train Afghan military and policy, but reiterated that an end to their combat role was "not negotiable."

Obama faces dual pressures at home: The war-weary American public wants out of Afghanistan, the country's longest war, but Republicans have blasted the president for setting a departure date, saying this will only embolden Islamist fighters and lead friendly Afghans to hedge their bets.

Mitt Romney, in an op-ed for the Chicago Tribune, accused Obama of failing to show leadership inside NATO and of putting America "on a path to a hollow military" and said he would reverse both trends. He did not detail his own Afghanistan policy.

The United States is on track to reduce its presence to 68,000 troops by late September. More than 3,000 Americans have been killed in the decade-long conflict launched to catch or kill Osama bin Laden, whom Navy SEALS shot dead in a dramatic May 2011 raid inside Pakistan.

That country closed supply lines for NATO forces after a November strike inside its territory killed 24 Pakistan soldiers. Negotiations to reopen them have yet to bear fruit. Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari is attending the summit, but Obama has not plans to meet with him one-on-one.

"The president will certainly have a chance to see him and speak to him," Deputy National Security Advisor Ben Rhodes told reporters aboard Air Force One late Saturday.

"On the supply lines, we believe that this is going to be resolved," Rhodes said. "We expect that to take some time.?So there is still work to be done through those negotiations."

NATO leaders are also expected to take up the issue of Iran's suspect nuclear program, as well as how the alliance should respond to the bloody crackdown in Syria.

More popular Yahoo! News stories:

? Lockerbie bomber dies in Libya hospital

? Obama, France's Hollande hunt for Afghanistan compromise

? Paul Ryan is suffering from veepstakes fatigue

dan henderson oregon ducks oregon ducks oregon football lana turner donald glover julio cesar chavez jr